Dr. Nikhil Bhaguna

BIOMIMETIC DENTISTRY – STRIKING THE RIGHT BALANCE BETWEEN THE TOOTH, TISSUE AND THE STOMATOGNATHIC SYSTEM

Abstract:

Dentistry has come a long way since Dr. GV Black gave his principles of mechanical retention. The one thing that has unarguably changed the face of modern day dentistry is BONDING. Material science has far progressed in the last few decades and adhesive dentistry is a main stay of daily clinical practice.

Predictable and long term results can only be achieved if a perfect blend of material science with the physiology of the stomatognathic system is attained. All this, stitched together with the modern digital technology can produce results which in true sense justify the biology of aesthetics.

Utilising material science that closely mimics the natural dentition, and at the same time allows ease and accuracy of work would definitely help optimise practice quality and also be efficient in terms of time and cost.

The aim of this workshop is to focus on developing a BioMimetic core that closely retains and regains the flexibility of the natural dentin and strength of covering enamel thereby adding strength against lateral and functional forces.

The use of glass fibre based technology and adhesive resin technology shall be discussed in detail to create effective and lower lasting restorations avoiding catastrophic failures.

Dr. Veena Jain

SCULPTING AURICULAR PROSTHESIS

Abstract:

Face remains the central focus of our gaze when we engage in interpersonal relationships. Developmental and acquired aberrations of this region are likely to be more obvious than other parts of body therefore perceive as more disfiguring.

The reconstruction or rehabilitation of facial defects is challenging for the surgeon as well as the Prosthodontist. Both surgical and prosthetic reconstruction has its limitations. The surgeon is limited by the availability of tissues, contracture of the tissues surrounding the defect and no. of surgeries required for reconstruction. The Prosthodontist is limited by the property of available materials, mobility of tissues surrounding the defect, difficulty in establishing retention for large prosthesis & the patient ability to accept the outcome.

Acceptance of facial prosthesis by patients has improved dramatically since the introduction of osseointegerated implants. The retention provided by the implants allows the use of large prosthesis on movable tissues. Acceptance of auricular prosthesis is further enhanced by improve aesthetics results from thin margin of the prosthesis, accurate and reputable positioning of prosthesis and the ease of maintenance.

The main objective of this preconference session is to highlight clinical steps and laboratory procedures for fabrication of implant retained auricular prosthesis. The course will be tailor made to suit the requirements of the early learners. It will also refresh the clinical and prosthetic concepts of seasoned practitioners. Underpinning theme of the course is to help a specialist recapitulate the biofom of auricular prosthesis, from an Indian perspective.

Dr. Sandeep Singh

HARD & SOFT TISSUE SYMPHONY – RECESSION COVERAGE & GBRC

Abstract:

A major limitation for successful implant placement is inadequate alveolar-ridge width and height. Thus, to satisfy the ideal goals of implant dentistry, the hard and soft tissues need to be present in ideal volume and quality.

Therefore, ridge splitting, sinus floor elevation and GBR of deficient alveolar ridges, horizontal or vertical, is an important aspect of dental implant therapy with the end goal to provide functional restoration that is in harmony with the adjacent natural dentition.

In this era of aesthetic demand from patients, Oral soft tissue augmentation or grafting procedures are often necessary not only for aesthetic result but also to achieve proper wound closure after deficit resulting from tumor excision, clefts, trauma, dental implants, and tooth recessions.

Autologous soft tissue grafts still remain the gold standard to acquire a functionally adequate zone of keratinized attached gingiva. However, soft tissue substitutes are more commonly used because they minimize morbidity and shorten surgical time.